This page contains an index of burst data from SAX J1747.0-2853. Click on the burst number/time to go to the page for each burst

ID flag1 ObsID UT MJD PRE?
1 b,c 50104-01-01-00 2001 Sep 26 00:04:41 52178.003260 Y
2 b,c 50104-01-01-07 2001 Sep 26 23:16:56 52178.970100 Y
3 b,c 50104-01-01-09 2001 Sep 27 11:14:44 52179.468570 Y
4 b,c 50104-01-01-19 2001 Sep 27 21:20:00 52179.888890 N
5 b,c 50104-01-02-03 2001 Sep 28 00:23:07 52180.016060 N
6 b,c 50104-01-02-00 2001 Sep 28 04:36:10 52180.191790 N
7 b,c 50104-01-02-00 2001 Sep 28 08:07:49 52180.338770 N
8 b,c 50104-01-02-04 2001 Sep 29 05:05:21 52181.212050 Y
9 b,c 50104-01-02-04 2001 Sep 29 08:11:20 52181.341220 N
10 b,c 50104-01-02-13 2001 Sep 29 14:22:47 52181.599170 Y
11 b,c 50104-01-02-05 2001 Sep 29 23:30:50 52181.979760 Y
12 b,c 50104-01-02-22 2001 Oct 4 15:12:03 52186.633370 Y
13 b,c 50104-01-03-03 2001 Oct 5 10:45:37 52187.448350 Y
14 b,c 50104-01-03-00 2001 Oct 6 02:10:57 52188.090940 Y
15 b,c 50104-01-03-09 2001 Oct 6 13:02:42 52188.543550 Y
16 c 90058-02-06-00 2004 Apr 1 14:53:18 53096.620350 N
17 c 90058-02-07-00 2004 Apr 3 20:41:34 53098.862210 N
18 b,c 93064-01-01-06 2007 Oct 8 02:58:26 54381.123920 N
19 c,f 93064-01-01-00 2007 Oct 8 08:41:35 54381.362220
20 c,f 93064-01-01-00 2007 Oct 8 11:10:24 54381.465560
21 c 93064-01-01-00 2007 Oct 8 11:52:09 54381.494560 Y
22 b,c 93064-01-01-02 2007 Oct 8 13:30:08 54381.562600 N
23 b,c 93064-01-01-08 2007 Oct 9 00:48:51 54382.033940 N

Flag values indicates a range of potential analysis issues, as follows:

  1. The burst was observed during a slew, and thus offsetfrom the source position.
  2. The observation was offset from the source position. In cases (a) and (b) we scaled the flux and fluence by the mean collimator response appropriate for the position of the source in the field of view, as described in Appendix B.
  3. The origin of the burst is uncertain; the burst may have been from another source in the field of view (we rescaled the flux and fluence, if necessary, based on the assumed origin).
  4. Buffer overruns (or some other instrumental effect) caused gaps in the high time resolution data.
  5. The burst was so faint that only the peak flux could be measured, and not the fluence or other parameters.
  6. An extremely faint burst or possibly problems with the background subtraction, resulting in no fit results.
  7. The full burst profile was not observed, so that the event can be considered an unconfirmed burst candidate. Typically in these cases the initial burst rise is missed, so that the measured peak flux and fluence are lower limits only.
  8. High time resolution data modes did not cover the burst.