This page contains an index of burst data from EXO 1745-248. Click on the burst number/time to go to the page for each burst

ID flag1 ObsID UT MJD PRE?
1 b 50138-03-01-00 2000 Jul 13 05:02:38 51738.210170 N
2 b 50138-03-03-00 2000 Jul 16 11:12:24 51741.466960 N
3 b 50138-03-04-00 2000 Jul 17 12:26:30 51742.518410 N
4 b 50138-03-05-00 2000 Jul 18 14:42:50 51743.613090 N
5 b 50054-06-01-00 2000 Jul 21 11:11:03 51746.466010 N
6 b 50054-06-01-01 2000 Jul 24 15:36:23 51749.650280 N
7 b 50054-06-02-00 2000 Jul 28 07:16:10 51753.302900 N
8 b 50054-06-02-01 2000 Jul 31 06:36:29 51756.275340 N
9 b 50054-06-02-02 2000 Aug 3 04:53:32 51759.203850 N
10 b 50054-06-03-00 2000 Aug 6 14:08:26 51762.589200 N
11 b 50054-06-03-00 2000 Aug 6 14:51:38 51762.619200 N
12 b 50054-06-04-01 2000 Aug 13 03:59:58 51769.166660
13 b 50054-06-04-00 2000 Aug 13 09:09:14 51769.381410 N
14 b 50054-06-04-00 2000 Aug 13 12:05:58 51769.504160 N
15 b 50054-06-04-00 2000 Aug 13 12:38:20 51769.526630 N
16 b 50054-06-04-00 2000 Aug 13 13:27:24 51769.560710 N
17 b 50054-06-04-00 2000 Aug 13 13:59:28 51769.582970
18 b 50054-06-04-03 2000 Aug 15 18:07:37 51771.755290
19 b 50054-06-04-03 2000 Aug 15 18:24:51 51771.767260
20 b 50054-06-04-03 2000 Aug 15 18:45:21 51771.781500
21 b,d 50054-06-10-00 2000 Sep 24 01:43:14 51811.071700 Y
22 b,d 50054-06-11-02 2000 Oct 2 15:18:59 51819.638190 Y

Flag values indicates a range of potential analysis issues, as follows:

  1. The burst was observed during a slew, and thus offsetfrom the source position.
  2. The observation was offset from the source position. In cases (a) and (b) we scaled the flux and fluence by the mean collimator response appropriate for the position of the source in the field of view, as described in Appendix B.
  3. The origin of the burst is uncertain; the burst may have been from another source in the field of view (we rescaled the flux and fluence, if necessary, based on the assumed origin).
  4. Buffer overruns (or some other instrumental effect) caused gaps in the high time resolution data.
  5. The burst was so faint that only the peak flux could be measured, and not the fluence or other parameters.
  6. An extremely faint burst or possibly problems with the background subtraction, resulting in no fit results.
  7. The full burst profile was not observed, so that the event can be considered an unconfirmed burst candidate. Typically in these cases the initial burst rise is missed, so that the measured peak flux and fluence are lower limits only.
  8. High time resolution data modes did not cover the burst.