Unit |
ECC5650 |
Topics |
Identities and the Expenditure Function |
A useful identity: Roy's Identity
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
For the general consumer's utility maximization problem, prove the following identities for y=1:
Inverse demand function:
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
Direct demand function:
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
Prove Shephard's Lemma (for the consumer). That is, that if
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
is differentiable inlatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
atlatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
withlatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
then,latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
For the budget minimization problem in
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
with utility given by the CES utility functionlatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
(
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
), show that the Hicksian demand functions are given bylatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
where
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
and the corresponding expenditure function is given bylatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
Verify your answer above by using the fact that
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
andlatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
.