Unit

ECC5650

Topics

Consumer Preference Theory, Utility Functions

Preference Relations

  1. [JR Ex 1.2] Let

    latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
    
    
    be a preference relation, prove the following:
    • NB: Sice

      latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      
      is a 'preference relation', it must satisfy the axioms of completeness and transitivity.
    • latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      
    • latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      
    • latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      
    • latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      
  2. [JR Ex 1.6] Cite a credible example where the preferences of an "ordinary consumer" would be unlikely to satisfy the axiom of convexity.

Utility Functions

  1. [JR Ex 1.12] Suppose

    latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
    
    
    and
    latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
    
    
    are both utility functions.
    1. If both u and v are homogeneous of degree r. Prove that the function

      latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      

      is also homogeneous of degree r.

    2. If both u and v are quasiconcave, then

      latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
      
      
      is also quasiconcave.
  2. [JR Ex 1.17] Suppose that preferences are convex but not strictly so. Give a clear and convincing argument that a solution to the consumer's problem still exists, but that it need not be unique. Illustrate your argument with a two-good example.

Indirect Utility Functions Consider the Indirect Utility Function version of the Utility Maximization Problem:

latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:

such that

latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:

. Prove the following two propositions:

  1. Prop I v(p,y) is homogeneous of degree 0 in (p,y).

  2. Prop II v(p,y) is increasing in y. (Hint: use the Envelope Theorem)

MonashU/ECC5650MicroTheory/ProblemSet02 (last edited 2009-04-06 05:30:36 by Supervisor2012)