Unit |
ECC5650 |
Topics |
Consumer Preference Theory, Utility Functions |
Preference Relations
[JR Ex 1.2] Let
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
be a preference relation, prove the following:NB: Sice
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
is a 'preference relation', it must satisfy the axioms of completeness and transitivity.latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
- [JR Ex 1.6] Cite a credible example where the preferences of an "ordinary consumer" would be unlikely to satisfy the axiom of convexity.
Utility Functions
[JR Ex 1.12] Suppose
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
andlatex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
are both utility functions.If both u and v are homogeneous of degree r. Prove that the function
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
is also homogeneous of degree r.
If both u and v are quasiconcave, then
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
is also quasiconcave.
- [JR Ex 1.17] Suppose that preferences are convex but not strictly so. Give a clear and convincing argument that a solution to the consumer's problem still exists, but that it need not be unique. Illustrate your argument with a two-good example.
Indirect Utility Functions Consider the Indirect Utility Function version of the Utility Maximization Problem:
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
such that
latex error! exitcode was 2 (signal 0), transscript follows:
. Prove the following two propositions:
Prop I v(p,y) is homogeneous of degree 0 in (p,y).
Prop II v(p,y) is increasing in y. (Hint: use the Envelope Theorem)