Search engine run on:

Glookbib search for: KPIs

%A P. Wouters
%T Eugene Garfield (1925–2017)
%J Nature
%V 543
%N 492
%D 2017
%K biog, obit, c2017, c201x, c20xx, zz1119, Science Citation Index, SCI,
   scientific, web of science, research, KPI, KPIs, hindex, impact, papers,
   publications, citations, publish, perish, Shepard, c1873, c187x, c18xx
%X "... introduced Garfield to Shepard's Citations, a system for legal citations
   invented in 1873 that tracked how US court cases cited earlier ones ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/543492a]['19].
   [Also search for: citation SCI]  and  [also search for: publish perish].

%A E. W. H.
%T Catalogue of Scientific Papers
%V 116
%P 129-130
%D 1925
%K c1925, c192x, c19xx, zz0320, Catalogue of Scientific Papers, Royal Society,
   publications, literature, papers, science citation index, SCI, research,
   KPI, KPIs, impact, journals
%X "With the publ'n of the vol. before us, the indexing of the sci. papers of
   the 19th century under their authors' names has been successfully brought to
   a close. It is unnecessary to reiterate the high opinion which we have
   previously expressed of the practical utility of this monumental undertaking
   & of the high standard of accuracy maintained by its successive editors &
   their staffs. The 'Catalogue Scientific Papers' is an indispensable tool for
   the research student and historian of science alike."
   -- [doi:10.1038/116129a0]['20].
      (Also see, "... an attempt ... to catalogue all papers published in sci.
      periodicals back to the year 1800 & produce a bibliographic index
      organised by author. ..."
      -- CofSP@[wikip]['20].)
   [Also search for: science index sci].

%A C. M. Case
%T Scholarship in Sociology
%J Sociology and Social Res.
%V 12
%P 323-340
%D 1928
%K c1928, c192x, c19xx, zz0820, publish or perish, quote, quotable, aphorism,
   academic, academia, university, scientific, research, management, journals,
   pressure, KPI, KPIs
%X "Publish or perish" attributed:
       "... The earliest known use of the term [P or P] in an
       academic context was in a 1928 journal article. ..."
   -- PorP@[wikip]['20].

%A E. Garfield
%T Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through
   association of ideas
%J Science
%V 122
%N 3159
%P 108-111
%D 1955
%K jrnl, c1955, c195x, c19xx, zz1119, Garfield, scientific research, papers,
   publications, web, science citation index, SCI, history, citations, impact,
   KPI, KPIs, bibliometrics, publish, perish
%X -- [doi:10.1126/science.122.3159.108['19].
   [Also search for: citation publications].

%A D. T. Campbell
%T Assessing the impact of planned social change
%J Evaluation and Program Planning
%V 2
%N 1
%P 67-90
%D 1979
%K jrnl, c1979, c197x, c19xx, zz0319, Campbell's, Campbells, Campbell, law,
   laws, cambell, measure, impact, KPI, KPIs, JIF, Hindex, quote, quotable,
   funny, scientific research, assessment, management, university, distortion,
   corruption, corrupt, game, gaming, spoof, spoofing, abuse
%X "It is a special characteristic of all modern societies that we consciously
   decide on and plan projects designed to improve our social systems. It is our
   universal predicament that our projects do not always have their intended
   effects. Very probably we all share in the experience that often we cannot
   tell whether the project had any impact at all, so complex is the flux of
   historical changes that would have been going on anyway, and so many are the
   other projects that might be expected to modify the same indicators. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1016/0149-7189(79)90048-X]['19].
   Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for
      social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption
      pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social
      processes it is intended to monitor."
      -- CL@[wikip]['19].
   (Also see 'Incentive malus ...', The Economist 24/9/2016 [www]['19].)
   [Also search for: Goodhart law]  and  [also search for: publish perish].

%A C. A. E. Goodhart
%T Problems of Monetary Management: The U.K. Experience
%B Monetary Theory and Practice
%E A. S. Courakis
%P 91-121
%D 1984
%K Goodharts, Goodhart's law, laws, c1984, c198x, c19xx, zz0319, assessment, UK,
   measure, evaluation, funny, ranking, impact, JIF, KPI, KPIs, Hindex,
   scientific research, university, distortion, corruption, misuse, gaming
%X "In 1971 the monetary authorities in the UK adopted a new approach to
   monetary management, a change of policy announced & described in several
   papers on competition & credit control. The subsequent experience of trying
   to operate this revised system has, however, been troublesome & at times
   unhappy. The purpose here is to examine certain aspects of recent monetary
   developments in order to illustrate a number of more general analytical
   themes which may have relevance among several countries."
   -- [doi:10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_4]['19].
   in: uk us isbn:0333360591; uk us isbn13:978-1349172955;
       uk us isbn13:9780333360606 ?
   [[MonashUni library seems to have a copy, offsite. '19]]
      (Previously I thought it was in:
      'Inflation, Depression, and Economic Policy in the West',
      pp.111-146, 1981. ??Maybe also??)
   See, "... original formulation [of G's law] was:
        'Any observed statistical regularity will tend to collapse once
        pressure is placed upon it for control purposes.' ..."
   And, "... has been phrased by Marilyn Strathern as
        'When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.' ..."
   And, "... All metrics of scientific evaluation are bound to be abused. ...
        ... because people start to game it. ..."
   -- GL@[wikip]['19].
   [Also search for: Campbell law]  and  [also search for: publish perish].

%A A. G. Bedeian
%T The Dean's Disease: How the darker side of power manifests itself in the
   office of Dean
%J Academy  of Management Learning and Education
%V 1
%N 2
%P 164-173
%D 2002
%K jrnl, c2002, c200x, c20xx, zz0619, university, management, faculty, dean,
   deans, deanlet, deanitis, power, ethics, corrupts, academic, academia,
   research, impact, KPI, KPIs, higher education
%X "Commentators since the time of Greek dramatist Sophocles have noted that the
   exercise of power often produces strong psychological changes in people. As
   power holders, deans comprise far too few exceptions to this insight. Early
   in their tenure new deans are generally grateful for the confidence placed in
   them by their former colleagues & are eager to work together in changing
   "the system" to eliminate unjust privileges and practices. But soon feelings
   of overwhelming gratitude & oneness become faint memories. Within months of
   taking office, such feelings undergo a transformation so subtle that those
   affected are unaware of changes in their thinkingand behavior. ..."
   -- [doi:10.5465/AMLE.2002.8509359]['19],
   [Also search for: university management].

%A J. E. Hirsch
%T An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output
%V 102
%N 46
%P 16569-16572
%D 2005
%K jrnl, PNAS, JEHirsch, c2005, c200x, c20xx, zz0807, index, impact factor,
   h index, Hindex, KPI, KPIs, metric, metrics, success, citation, citations,
   researcher, quality, productivity, publish, perish, publication,
   publications, Gindex, coercive, manipulation, abuse, bibliometrics, science,
   scientific research, ethics
%X "I propose the index h, defined as the no. of papers with citation no. >= h,
   as a useful index to characterize the scientific output of a researcher."
   [Max. h s.t. his/her top h papers have at least h citations each.]
   -- [doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102]['07].
   Also see [doi:10.1038/448737a]['07].
  [Also search for: Hirsch Hindex]  and  [also search for: publish perish].
  [[Such an index is of course open to manipulation:
      Imagine an academic, X, whose mission when on a programme committee
      is to cause submitting authors to add references, often of little or
      no genuine relevance, to X's own work.  All it takes is a lazy,
      compliant, weak, or stressed editor to let it happen. Maybe you know X?]]
  * [Also search for: Hirsch c2020] *.

%A L. Egghe
%T Theory and practise of the g-index
%J Scientometrics
%V 69
%N 1
%P 131-152
%D 2006
%K jrnl, c2006, c200x, c20xx, publish, perish, research, publication,
   publications, G index, Gindex, citation, citations, metric, metrics,
   impact factor, quality, KPI, KPIs, practice
%X "Given a set of articles ranked in decreasing order of the # of citations
   that they received, the g-index is the unique largest number such that
   the top g articles together received at least g**2 citations."
   -- [doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7]['10].
   [Also search for: Hindex] and [also search for: Gindex].

%A P. Ball
%T Achievement index climbs the ranks
%J Nature
%V 448
%P 737
%D 2007
%K news, views, c2007, c200x, c20xx, zz0807, key performance indicator,
   KPI, KPIs, Hirsch, indicators, research, researcher, prediction, predicting,
   success, impact factor, metric, metrics, h index, Hindex, publish, perish
%X "... h-index was first proposed in 2005 by Hirsch ... the h-index offers an
   alternative: it is the number n of a researcher's papers that have all
   received at least n citations. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/448737a]['07].
   [Also search for: Hindex] and [also search for: Gindex].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A E. Garfield
%T The evolution of the Science Citation Index
%J Int. J. Microbio.
%V 10
%P 65-69
%D 2007
%K jrnl, c2007, c200x, c20xx, zz0320, Science Citation Index, history, SCI, ISI,
   KPI, KPIs, bibliometrics, publish, perish, scientific reseach, impact, JIF,
%X "The Science Citation Index (SCI) was first promulgated in Science in
   1955, as an up-to-date tool to facilitate the dissemination and retrieval
   of scientific literature. Its practicalrealization was possible thanks to
   the already-existing infor-mation service, Current Contents. ..."
   -- pdf@[upenn]['20],
      [doi:10.2436/20.1501.01.10]['20] -- but the jrnl cheats on the doi.
   (Also see SCI@[wikip]['20].)
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A M. Schreiber
%T A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored
%J J. Informetrics
%V 2
%N 3
%P 211-216
%D 2008
%K jrnl, c2008, c200x, c20xx, zz0919, publish, perish, Hindex, hmIndex,
   authorship, multiple authors, papers, citations, KPI, KPIs
%X "In order to take multiple co-authorship appropriately into account, a
   straightforward modification of the Hirsch index was recently proposed.
   Fractionalised counting of the papers yields an appropriate measure which is
   called the hm-index. The effect of this procedure is compared in the present
   work with other variants of the h-index and found to be superior to the
   fractionalised counting of citations and to the normalization of the h-index
   with the avg # of authors in the h-core. Three fictitious examples for model
   cases and one empirical case are analysed."
   -- [doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.05.001]['19].
   [Also search for: hmIndex] and [also search for: Hindex].

%T Experts still needed
%J Nature
%V 457
%P 7-8
%D 2009
%K c2009, c200x, c20xx, zz0109, editorial, expert, research assessment exercise,
   RAE, research excellence framework, REF, metrics, KPI, KPIs, United Kingdom,
   UK, university, universities
%X There are good reasons to be suspicious of metric-based research assessment.
   ... Many countries are keen to measure their universities' res. performance
   with minimal burdens on the participants. Not least of these is the UK, which
   last month announced the results of its 6th & final (RAE, see p.13).
   The RAE relied heavily on expert peer review of research publications, &
   attention in Britain & beyond is now focused on what form the replacement
   system will take. The proposed successor, the Research Excellence Framework
   (REF), is opaque. Little is known about how it will work other than a central
   principle: it will assess research quality using metrics, inc. publication
   citations. It may also take into account the # of p/g completing their
   studies & the amount of research income won by universities. There will be a
   smattering of 'light-touch expert review', although the exact form that this
   will take is not yet clear - it might simply be used to interpret the metrics
   results. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/457007b]['09],
   also see [doi:10.1038/457013a]['09].

%A D. Siegel
%A P. Baveye
%T Battling the paper glut
%J Science
%P 1466
%D 2010
%K views, c2010, c201x, c20xx, zz0910, publish, publication, perish, adacdemic,
   papers, glut, jrnls, flood, Hindex, Gindex, KPI, least publishable unit, LPU,
   KPIs, scientific research, metric, measure, quality, impact, productivity,
   implausibly, prolific
%X "... As soon as the 'publish or perish' concept (the imperative to publish
   work constantly to further or sustain an academic career) surfaced in the
   United States in the early 1950s, academics criticized it openly as a recipe
   for disaster. Nevertheless, in the early to mid-1980s, administrators in
   universities systematically began to use the # of articles published per year
   by individual faculty members as a measure of their productivity. ...
   "least publishable units" ... Multi-authored manuscripts increased regardless
   of true contribution to the work. ... Researchers have reacted to this
   publication glut by developing bibliometric indices, such as the h- &
   g-indexes, ... As the medical community proposed 25 years ago, researchers
   should never be allowed to include more than three publications per year in
   activity reports; in research proposals, principal investigators should cite
   no more than 10 papers. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1126/science.329.5998.1466-a]['10].
   (Also see [doi:10.1126/science.331.6013.29-b]['11], claws out.)
   [Also search for: implausibly prolific].

%A D. Colquhoun
%T Publish-or-perish: Peer review and the corruption of science
%I The Guardian
%M 5th SEP
%D 2011
%K news, newspaper, c2011, c201x, c20xx, zz0911, publish, perish, publications,
   science, scientific research, university management, administration,
   KPI, KPIs, impact, JIF, misuse
%X '... Peer review is the process that decides whether your work gets published
   in an academic journal. It doesn't work very well any more, mainly as a
   result of the enormous number of papers that are being published (an est.
   1.3 million papers in 23,750 journals in 2006). There simply aren't enough
   competent people to do the job. ...
   Not long ago, Imperial College's medicine department were told that their
   "productivity" target for publications was to "publish three papers per annum
   including one in a prestigious journal with an impact factor of at least
   five." The effect of instructions like that is to reduce the quality of
   science and to demoralise the victims of this sort of mismanagement. ...
   David Colquhoun is prof. of pharmacology at University College London ...'
   -- [www]['11];
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A M. Pavlou
%A E. P. Diamandis
%T The athletes of science
%J Nature
%V 478
%P 419
%D 2011
%K views, c2011, c201x, c20xx, zz1111, publish and perish, impact, KPI, KPIs,
   Hindex, Gindex, rank, rankings, research, metrics, publications, citation,
   citations, everything, count, counted, quote, quotable, cite, science, ISI,
   SCI, academic
%X '... adapted from a saying by Albert Einstein[?]: "Many of the things you
   can count, don't count. Many of the things you can't count, do count. ...'
   -- [doi:10.1038/nj7369-419a]['11].
   *BUT* [also search for: count quote] and [also search for: publish perish].

%A B. Ginsberg
%T The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and
   Why it Matters
%P 264
%D 2011
%K book, text, OUP, university, tertiary education, administration, policy,
   bureaucracy, KPIs, faculty, dean, deanlet, deanitis, management,
   managerialism, USA
%X 1st ed 2011; hb us$25; isbn:019978244X; isbn13:978-0199782444.
   "... examines the fallout of rampant administrative blight that now plagues
   the nation's universities. In the past decade, universities have added layers
   of administrators & staffers to their payrolls every year even while laying
   off full-time faculty in increasing numbers - ostensibly because of budget
   cuts. In a further irony, many of the newly minted - and non-academic -
   administrators are career managers who downplay the importance of teaching &
   research, as evidenced by their tireless advocacy for a banal 'life skills'
   curriculum. Consequently, students are denied a more enriching educational
   experience - one defined by intellectual rigor. Ginsberg also reveals how the
   legitimate grievances of minority groups & liberal activists, which were
   traditionally championed by faculty members, have, in the hands of
   admins., been reduced to chess pieces in a game of power politics. ..."
   [Also search for: university management].

%A K. Weaver
%T Lab life: Scientists are snobs
%J Nature
%V 495
%P 167-168
%D 2013
%K comment, views, c2013, c201x, c20xx, zz0313, publish, perish, grant,
   funding, citations, citing, KPI, KPIs, rank, ranking, impact factor
%X "It is a mistake to dismiss the people and projects coming out of
   lesser-known institutions, argues Keith Weaver - they have strengths too ...
   Of potentially greater impact is the effect this scientific snobbery has on
   citation practices. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/495167a]['13], amen.

%A D. L. Herbert
%A A. G. Barnett
%A N. Graves
%T Funding: Australia's grant system wastes time
%J Nature
%V 495
%P 314
%D 2013
%K views, c2013, c201x, c20xx, zz00413, peer review, publish perish, ARC, NHMRC,
   grants, stats, analysis, Australia, au, QUT, University, science, research,
   KIP, KPIs, funding, time, waste, applications, quote, quotable
%X "We found that scientists in Australia spent more than five centuries' worth
   of time preparing research-grant proposals for consideration by the largest
   funding scheme of 2012. Because just 20.5% of these applications were
   successful, the equivalent of some four centuries of effort returned no
   immediate benefit to researchers and wasted ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/495314d]['13].
   [Also search for: research funding]  and [also search for: publish perish].

%A B. Alberts
%T Impact factor distortions
%J Science
%V 340
%N 6134
%P 787
%D 2013
%K editorial, c2013, c201x, c20xx, zz0513, KPI, KPIs, publish perish,
   San Francisco Declaration On Research Assessment, DORA, ASCB, publications,
   journals, JIF, JIFs, impact factor, conferences, science, scientific, papers,
   contribution, reading, university, academic, research quality, metric,
   distortion, misuse, CORE, ERA, ARC, quality, rank, ranking
%X '... San Francisco declaration on research Assessment (DORA), ...
   states that the impact factor must not be used as "a surrogate measure of the
   quality of individual research articles, to assess an individual scientist's
   contributions, or in hiring, promotion, or funding decisions." ...
   endorsed by more than 150 leading scientists and 75 scientific
   organizations.  ...   analyzing the scientific contributions of other
   researchers. To do so in a meaningful way requires the actual reading of a
   small selected set of each researcher's publications, a task that must not
   be passed by default to journal editors.'
   -- [doi:10.1126/science.1240319]['13].
   "The [SF] Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), initiated by the Amer.
   Soc. for Cell Biology (ASCB) together with a group of editors & publishers
   of scholarly journals, recognizes the need to improve the ways in which the
   outputs of scientific research are evaluated. The group met in Dec. 2012
   during the ASCB Annual Meeting in [SF] & subsequently circulated a draft
   decln among various stakeholders. DORA as it now stands has benefited from
   input by many of the original signers listed below. It is a worldwide
   initiative covering all scholarly disciplines. We encourage individuals &
   organizations who are concerned about the appropriate assessment of
   scientific research to sign DORA."
   -- DORA@[ASCB]['14].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A C. Macilwain
%T Halt the avalanche of performance metrics
%J Nature
%V 500
%N 7462
%P ?
%D 2013
%K views, c2013, c201x, c20xx, zz0813, publish, perish, scientific research,
   DORA, quality, performance, impact, measures, citations, rank, rankings,
   misuse, assessment, Snowball, snowballmetrics, grants, academic, education,
   University management, VC, Deans, KPI, KPIs
%X "... power has moved from the depts to the vice-chancellor. And U.leaders,
   flanked by research managers & associated flunkies, want to use metrics to
   shift that balance still further. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/500255a]['13].
   [Also search for: publish perish] & [also search for: publish perish misuse].

%A D. Aitkenhead
%T Peter Higgs: I wouldn't be productive enough for today's academic system
%J The Guardian
%D 2013
%K news, interview, c2013, c201x, c20xx, physics, Higgs boson, mass,
   2013 Nobel prize, NobelPrize, publish, perish, KPI, KPIs,
   Edinburgh University, scientific research, science, management, impact,
   publications, papers, quote, quotable
%X '... published fewer than 10 papers after his groundbreaking work, which
   identified the mechanism by which subatomic material acquires mass, was
   published in 1964. ...  authorities then took the view, he later learned,
   that he "might get a Nobel prize - and if he doesn't we can always get rid
   of him". Higgs said he became "an embarrassment to the department when they
   did research assessment exercises". A message would go around the department
   saying: "Please give a list of your recent publications." Higgs said:
   "I would send back a statement: 'None.'" ...'
   -- The G [7/12/2013]['20].

%A E. Szeng
%T How academia and publishing are destroying scientific innovation:
   A conversation with Sydney Brenner
%J King's review
%D 2014
%K news, views, c2014, c201x, c20xx, zz0314, publish, perish, KPI, KPIs,
   scientific research, impact, peer review, misuse, reviewing, refereeing,
   Sydney Brenner, Peter Higgs, grant, grants, funding, ARC, NIH, NHMRC,
   quote, quotable, Nobel prize, NobelPrize
%X "I recently had the privilege of speaking with Professor Sydney Brenner, a
   prof. of Genetic medicine at the Univ. of Cambridge & Nobel Laureate in
   Physiology or Medicine in 2002 ...
   SB: 'Today the Americans have developed a new culture in science
       based on the slavery of graduate students. Now graduate students
       of American institutions are afraid. He just performs. He's got
       to perform. ... .'
   ... 'A Fred Sanger would not survive today's world of science. With
   continuous reporting & appraisals, some committee would note that
   he published little of import between insulin in 1952 & his
   first paper on RNA sequencing in 1967 with another long gap until
   DNA sequencing in 1977. He would be labelled as unproductive, &
   his modest personal support would be denied. We no longer have a
   culture that allows individuals to embark on long-term - & what
   would be considered today extremely risky - projects.'
      I found this particularly striking given that another recent Nobel
   prize winner, Peter Higgs, who identified the particle that bears
   his name, the Higgs boson, similarly remarked in an interview with
   the Guardian that, 'he doubts a similar breakthrough could be
   achieved in today's academic culture, because of the expectations
   on academics to collaborate & keep churning out papers. He said
   that: "it's difficult to imagine how I would ever have enough peace
   & quiet in the present sort of climate to do what I did in 1964."'
   ... 'I think peer review is hindering science. In fact, I think it
   has become a completely corrupt system. ...' ..."
   -- [www]['14].
   [Also search for: peer review].

%A M. Parker
%T University, Ltd: Changing a business school
%J Organization
%D 2014
%K jrnl, c2014, c201x, c20xx, zz0419, university, management, faculty, teaching,
   research, administration, deans, change, managerialism, KIP, KPIs, impact,
   league tables, Leicester, UK
%X "... recounts two years in the change management of a European business
   school. Using evidence gained whilst I was an employee, I describe the
   condns & institutional mechanisms which allowed an 'earth shattering' change
   programme to take place. This involved discounting the past & claiming that
   anyone who is against change is either self-interested or doesn't
   understand the 'real world'. The lack of collective & successful resistance
   is of particular concern here, since it suggests that (in certain contexts)
   academics are incapable of preventing their own institutions changing around
   them. Exit appears to be the only choice, when loyalty is questioned &
   voice impossible. I conclude with some observations on the relationship
   between the managerial business school & the idea of the university."
   -- [doi:10.1177/1350508413502646]['19]
   or []['19].
   [Also search for: university management].

%A N. Hall
%T The Kardashian index: A measure of discrepant social media profile for
%J Genome Biol.
%V 15
%N 7
%P 424
%D 2014
%K jrnl, c2014, c201x, c20xx, zz0814, publish, perish, impact, KPI, KPIs,
   citations, kIndex, Hindex, gIndex, science, University, scientific research,
   funny, ha ha, haha, Kim Kardashian, fame, celebrity, social media,
   Twitter, tweet, followers
%X "In the era of social media there are now many different ways that a
   scientist can build their public profile; the publn of high-quality sci.
   papers being just one. While social media is a valuable tool for outreach &
   the sharing of ideas, there is a danger that this form of commn is gaining
   too high a value & that we are losing sight of key metrics of sci.value, such
   as citation indices. To help quantify this, I propose the 'Kardashian Index',
   a measure of discrepancy between a scientist's social media profile &
   publication record based on the direct comparison of # of citations &
   Twitter followers."  [via TS and AK.]
   '... K_index = (# followers) / ("correct" # followers for citations) ...'
   -- [doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0424-0]['14].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A M. Braga
%A M. Paccagnella
%A M. Pellizzari
%T Evaluating students' evaluations of professors
%J Economics of Ed. Rev.
%V 41
%P 71-88
%D 2014
%K jrnl, c2014, c201x, c20xx, zz1014, teaching, education, lecturing, college,
   university, tertiary, teacher, professor, prof, lecturer, student, pupil,
   learning, review, course, evaluation, survey, opinion, quality, good,
   effectiveness, performance, ability, grades, weather, KPI, KPIs, stats
%X "... contrasts measures of teacher effectiveness with the students' eval. for
   the same teachers using admin. data from Bocconi U.. The effectiveness
   measures are est. by comparing the performance in follow-on coursework of
   students who are randomly assigned to teachers. We find that teacher quality
   matters substantially & that our measure of effectiveness is -vely correlated
   with the students' eval. of professors. A simple theory rationalizes this
   result under the assumption that students evaluate profs. based on their
   realized utility, an assumption that is supported by additional evidence
   that the evaluations respond to meteorological conditions."
      ("... Assuming that the weather affects utility & not teaching quality
       ... Our results show that students evaluate professors more negatively
       on rainy & cold days. ...")
      ("... The results, thus, suggest that the -ve correlns reported in table-8
       are mostly due to classes with a particularly low incidence of
       high ability students. ...")
      ("... good teachers are those who require their students to exert effort;
       students dislike it, especially the least able ones ...")
   -- [doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.04.002]['14].
   (Teacher effectiveness is negatively correlated with students' evaluations!-)

%A L. Pachter
%T To some a citation is worth $3 per year
%D 2014
%K blog, c2014, c201x, c20xx, zz1219, university, ranking, rankings, USNWR,
   rating, research, gaming, buying, adjunct, management, quality, KPI, KPIs,
   KAU, King Abdulaziz University
%X "Earlier this week US News and World Report (USNWR) released, for the first
   time, a global ranking of universities including rankings by subject area.
   In mathematics, the top ten unis. are:
   1. Berkeley; 2. Stanford; 3. Princeton; 4. UCLA; 5. U. of Oxford;
   6. Harvard; 7. King Abdulaziz University [KAU](*);
   8. Pierre and Marie Curie - Paris 6; 9. U. of Hong Kong;
   10. U. of Cambridge; ...  Even more surprising is the entry at #7
   that I have boldfaced: the math department at King Abdulaziz U. (KAU)
   in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. ...  KAU employs (as adjunct faculty) more than a
   quarter of the highly cited mathematicians at Thomson Reuters. ...
   professors are hired as adjunct pros. at KAU for $72,000 per year in return
   for agreeing (apparently by contract) to add KAU as a
   secondary affiliation ..."
   -- [www]['19].
      (I must confess to feeling a little grudging admiration of KAU
      for exploiting such a weak measure.)
   Also see Y.Bhattacharjee in Science, Dec 2011,
   [Also search for: university rankings].

%A D. Hicks,
%A P. Wouters,
%A L. Waltman,
%A S. de Rijcke
%A I. Rafols
%T Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
%J Nature
%V 520
%N 7548
%P 429-431
%D 2015
%K views, c2015, c201x, c20xx, zz0515, publish, perish, bibliometrics,
   impact, citations, altmetric, science, management, scientific research, ISI,
   InCites, SciVal, journals, JIF, KPI, KPIs, Hindex
%X "... The problem is that evaluation is now led by the data rather than by
   judgement. Metrics have proliferated: usually well intentioned, not always
   well informed, often ill applied. We risk damaging the system with the very
   tools designed to improve it ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/520429a]['15].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A P. Moriarty
%T The use of raw grant income as a performance target has got to go - now
%J Times Higher Ed
%D 2015
%K news, newspaper, c2015, c201x, c20xx, zz0615, higher education, university,
   research, management, academic, grant, income, target, grants, funding,
   KPI, KPIs, scientific research, Nottingham, Professor, Grimm,
   Imperial College London, ICL, ARC, THES, UK
%X "This mendacious metric is dangerous for individuals & the sector, & bad news
   for the taxpayer ... An analysis of research income targets in last week's
   Times Higher Education (Grant goals set for staff at one in six campuses,
   11 June) revealed that quite a few UK universities are esp. keen to
   incentivise academics to rip off the taxpayer. ... The use of raw grant
   income as a performance target has got to go. Now. It's blatantly flawed &
   immoral because it encourages us to overstate the publicly funded resources
   we need for our work. But there's a simple solution. Here's my advice to
   senior university managers: put aside the fixation on flawed metrics & trust
   your staff. ..."  [via AK.]
   -- [www][18/6/2015] -- paywalled '20.
   (Also see, "... I am of the opinion that you [Grimm] are struggling to
       fulfil the metrics of a Professorial post at Imperial College which
       include maintaining established funding in a programme of research
       with an attributable share of research spend of stg.200k p.a.
       ... ..."
   -- DC's Improbable Science,
   [Also search for: University KPIs].

%T The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in
   Research Assessment and Management
%D 2015
%K report, TR, c2015, c201x, c20xx, zz0715, scientific research, university,
   academic, excellence, peer review, refereeing, KPI, KPIs, impact, uk, review,
   grant, grants, funding, HEFCE, UK, ARC
%X "... investigate the current & potential future roles that quantitative
   indicators can play in the assessment & management of research. ... There is
   legitimate concern that some indicators can be misused or 'gamed': journal
   impact factors, university rankings & citation counts being three prominent
   examples. ... Analysis concluded that that no metric can currently provide
   a like-for-like replacement for REF peer review. ..."
   -- [MTide]['15]

%A R. Hil
%T Selling Students Short: Why You Won't Get the University Education You
%I AllenAndUnwin
%P 240
%D 2015
%K book, text, c2015, c201x, c20xx, zz0116, education system, tertiary, higher,
   University, Universities, Australia, grades, overseas, student, fee, fees,
   HECS debt, staff, teach, teaching, lecture, course, MOOCS, academic research,
   Go8, KPI, KPIs
%X 1st ed 2015; pb us$25; uk us isbn:1743318898; uk us isbn13:978-1743318898.
   "Today more students than ever before go to U., & what they experience there
   is vastly different from even a decade ago. The hi-tech libraries ... hide
   a less attractive reality. Today's Us. are vocationally driven, they use
   technology to offset staffing costs, class sizes have blown out, & staff are
   rewarded more for research than teaching. Students are less well prepared,
   they work longer hours in part-time jobs, & their education leaves them in
   debt for years. Drawing on research studies & his own interviews with 70 u/g
   students from Us. around .au, ... lifts the lid on the U. experience. ...
   argues Us. are turning out a consumer popln which is often unable to perform
   some of the most basic professional duties, & has little capacity to engage
   critically with the world around them."
   (Also see [abc][10/1/2016],
   and [www].)

%T All together now, or how Hamsters become co-authors of scientific papers
%I columbus-web
%D 2019
%K views, c2016, c201x, c20xx, zz0319, scientific, university, research,
   impact, JIF, KIP, KPIs, Hindex, publish, perish, guest authorship, hamster,
   Geim, publications, papers, LPU, LPUs, ranking, distortion, misuse, gaming,
   implausibly, improbably prolific, authorship abuse
%X "Recent developments in international research illustrate two well-known
   laws, the Goodhart and the Campbell laws, both developed in the middle of the
   70s. ... Say you write one paper a year. If you team up with a colleague
   doing similar work and write two half-papers instead, both parties end up
   with their names on twice as many papers, but with no increase in workload.
   Find a third researcher to join in and you can get your name on three papers
   a year. And so on. ... Sir Andre Geim, who won the 2010 Nobel Prize in
   physics, listed H.A.M.S. ter Tisha as co-author of a paper he published in
   2001 in Physica B, a peer-reviewed journal! ..."
   -- [www]['19].
   [Also search for: publish perish] & [also search for: implausibly prolific].

%T Measures of success
%J Science
%V 352
%N 6281
%P 28-30
%D 2016
%K view, c2016, c201x, c20xx, zz0416, scientific research, publish and perish,
   scientist, publications, papers, impact, KPI, KPIs, early career, Hindex
%X "In Jan., we asked young scientists this question: Do publns (# & impact)
   convey the true value of an early-career scientist? Out of the almost 200
   (self-selected) scientists who replied, about 75% did not think that publns
   conveyed a scientist's true value. About 25% said that publns were indeed
   the most important metric. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1126/science.352.6281.28]['16].
   [Also search for: publish perish]  and  [also search for: success luck].

%A M. Biagioli
%T Watch out for cheats in citation game
%J Nature
%V 535
%N 7611
%P 201
%D 2016
%K views, c2016, c201x, c20xx, zz0716, publish, perish, scientific research,
   impact, academic, KPI, KPIs, citation, citations, peer review, reviewing,
   refereeing, papers, publication, abuse, cheat, fraud, misconduct, academic
%X "The focus on impact of published research has created new opportunities for
   misconduct & fraudsters ... It is no longer enough for scientists to publish
   their work. The work must be seen to have an influential shelf life. This
   drive for impact places the academic paper at the centre of a web of metrics
   - typically, where it is published & how many times it is cited - & a good
   score on these metrics becomes a goal that scientists & publishers are
   willing to cheat for. ... fake email addresses of suggested peer reviewers.
   ... 'Review & citation' rings go a step further ... Others hack publisher
   databases to seek more invitations to review papers, & so possibly insert
   more citations to their own work. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/535201a]['16].
   [Also search for: publish perish]  and  [also search for: citation abuse].

%A D. Geman
%A S. Geman
%T Opinion: Science in the age of selfies
%V 113
%N 34
%P 9384-9387
%M ?
%D 2016
%K views, PNAS, c2016, c201x, c20xx, zz0916, publish and perish, scientific,
   university, academic, research, publications, infobabble, bandwagon, AI,
   big, data science, dataScience, LPU, Einstein, quote, quotable, impact,
   KPI, KPIs, performance, selfy, selfie
%X "A time traveler from 1915 arriving in 1965 would have been astonished by the
   scientific theories & engineering technologies invented during that half
   century. ... Would a visitor from 1965, having traveled the 50 years to 2015,
   be equally dazzled? ... Here there is a paradox: Today, there are many more
   scientists, & much more money is spent on research, yet the pace of
   fundamental innovation, the kinds of theories & engineering practices that
   will feed the pipeline of future progress, appears, to some observers,
   including us, to be slowing ...
   ... outsized claims for artificial intelligence in the 1960s. After all, the
   'knowledge representation' & 'knowledge engineering' of the 1960s are not
   so dissimilar to today's 'data science.' ...
   What has certainly changed is the ... behavior of scientists, partly driven
   by new technology that affects everyone & partly driven by an alteration in
   the system of rewards & incentives. ... Grigori Perelman's proof of the
   Poincare conjecture & Yitang Zhang's contributions to the twin-prime
   conjecture - were the work of iconoclasts with an instinct for solitude ...
   'minimum publishable units' [LPUs] ...
   Albert Einstein remarked that 'an academic career, in which a person is
   forced to produce scientific writings in great amounts, creates a danger of
   intellectual superficiality' ... Discard numerical performance metrics ..."
   -- [doi:10.1073/pnas.1609793113]['16], [via RH].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A P. E. Smaldino
%A R. McElreath
%T The natural selection of bad science
%J Royal Soc. Open Sci.
%D 2016
%K jrnl, c2016, c201x, c20xx, zz0319, scientific, university, research, stats,
   job, management, selection, methodology, pValue, significance, KPI, KPIs,
   impact, Hindex, papers, publications, realscientists, Campbell, law
%X "Poor research design & data analysis encourage false-positive findings. ...
   The persistence of poor methods results partly from incentives that favour
   them, leading to the natural selection of bad science. ...first present a
   60-year meta-analysis of statistical power in the behavioural sciences &
   show that power has not improved despite repeated demonstrations of the
   necessity of increasing power. ... As in the real world, successful labs
   produce more 'progeny,' such that their methods are more often copied & their
   students are more likely to start labs of their own. Selection for high
   output leads to poorer methods & increasingly high false discovery rates. We
   additionally show that replication slows but does not stop the process of
   methodological deterioration. Improving the quality of research requires
   change at the institutional level."
   -- [doi:10.1098/rsos.160384]['19].
   Also see Smaldino, Nature, 575, 9, 2019
   [doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03350-5]['19] and
   (Also see 'Incentive malus ...', The Economist 24/9/2016 [www]['19].)
   "I've been on a number of search committees. I don't remember anybody looking
   at anybody's papers. Number and IF [impact factor] of pubs are what counts.
   -- Terry McGlynn (realscientists) (21 Oct 2015, 4:12 p.m. Tweet.)
   [Also search for: Campbells law].

%A R. Sinatra
%A D. Wang
%A P. Deville
%A C. Song
%A A.-L. Barabasi
%T Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact
%J Science
%V 354
%N 6312
%D 2016
%K jrnl, c2016, c201x, c20xx, zz1116, publications, impact, KPI, KPIs,
   scientific, research, university, career, Hindex, scientist, researcher,
   QQ, factorQ, Qfactor, random, luck, lucky, prizes
%X "Despite the frequent use of numerous quantitative indicators to gauge the
   professional impact of a sci., little is known about how sci. impact emerges
   & evolves in time. ... quantify the changes in impact & productivity
   throughout a career in sci., finding that impact, as measured by influential
   publications, is distributed randomly within a sci.'s seq. of publns. This
   random-impact rule allows us to formulate a stochastic model that uncouples
   the effects of productivity, individual ability, & luck & unveils the
   existence of universal patterns governing the emergence of sci. success. The
   model assigns a unique individual parameter Q to each scientist, which is
   stable during a career, & it accurately predicts the evolution of a sci.'s
   impact, from the h-index to cumulative citations, & indep. recognitions, such
   as prizes."
   -- [doi:10.1126/science.aaf5239]['16] (via AK).

%A A. Csiszar
%T The catalogue that made metrics, and changed science
%J Nature
%V 551
%N 7679
%P 163-165
%D 2017
%K news, views, c2017, c201x, c20xx, zz1117, academic, scientific, research,
   Babbage, Catalogue of Scientific Papers, Garfield, Science Citation Index,
   SCI, citations, c18xx, history, publish, papers, perish, count, quality,
   impact, Hindex, KPI, KPIs, bibliometrics, altMetrics
%X "In 1830, Charles Babbage had an unusual idea. Exasperated by how little
   recognition science was getting in England, the computer pioneer and
   scientific provocateur suggested that quantifying authorship might be a way
   to identify scientific eminence.  ...  Babbage's suggestion to count authors'
   papers was met with various criticisms. One author did the calculation for
   each fellow in the Royal Society in London, and showed that this was a
   terrible guide to scientific eminence. Another pointed out that 'a far more
   satisfactory criterion' would have been 'the value of those papers'. ...
   When the first volumes of the Catalogue of Scientific Papers appeared at the
   end of 1867 ... [c1930+/-] the phrase publish or perish began to circulate in
   academia. ... In the 1960s, Eugene Garfield launched a radically different
   search tool, known as the Science Citation Index. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/551163a]['17].
   (Also see SCI@[wikip]['20].)
   [Also search for: publish perish] and [also search for: citation index SCI].

%A J. Belluz
%A B. Plumer
%A B. Resnick
%T The 7 biggest problems facing science, according to 270 scientists
%J Vox
%D 2016
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0519, scientific research, science,
   KPI, KPIs, university management, jobs, work, Hindex, grants, JIF, impact,
   ethics, ERA, ARC, pHacking, p hacking, peer review
%X "... we sent scientists a survey asking this simple question: If you could
   change one thing about how science works today, what would it be and why?
   We heard back from 270 scientists all over the world, including graduate
   students, senior professors, laboratory heads, and Fields Medalists. They
   told us that, in a variety of ways, their careers are being hijacked by
   perverse incentives. The result is bad science. ..."
   -- [www]['19].
   [Also search for: university management].

%A M. A. Edwards
%A S. Roy
%T Academic research in the 21st century: Maintaining scientific integrity in a
   climate of perverse incentives and hypercompetition
%J Environmental Eng. Sci.
%V 34
%N 1
%P ?-?
%D 2017
%K jrnl, c2017, c201x, c20xx, zz1218, publish, perish, scientific, research,
   ethics, integrity, academic, university, KPI, KPIs, grant, grants,
   EPA, NIH, ARC, misconduct, manipulation, abuse
%X "Over the last 50 years, we argue that incentives for academic scientists
   have become increasingly perverse in terms of competition for res.funding,
   development of quantitative metrics to measure performance, & a changing
   business model for higher ed. itself. [&] decreased discretionary funding at
   the federal & state level is creating a hypercompetitive environment between
   gvmt agencies (e.g., EPA, NIH, CDC), for scientists in these agencies, & for
   academics seeking funding from all sources - the combination of perverse
   incentives & decreased funding increases pressures that can lead to unethical
   behavior. If a critical mass of scientists become untrustworthy, a tipping
   point is possible in which the scientific enterprise itself becomes
   inherently corrupt & public trust is lost, risking a new dark age with
   devastating consequences to humanity. Academia & federal agencies should
   better support science as a public good, & incentivize altruistic & ethical
   outcomes, while de-emphasizing output."
   -- [doi:10.1089/ees.2016.0223]['18].
   [Also search for: publish perish]  and  [also search for: misconduct].

%A E. A. Fong
%A A. W. Wilhite
%T Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research
%J PLoS One
%V ?
%P ?-?
%D 2017
%K jrnl, eJrnl, c2017, c201x, c20xx, zz1217, academic, university, science,
   publish, perish, scientific research, papers, publications, authorship,
   honorary author, coercive, citation, citations, grant, grants, ARC, NIH,
   journals, JIF, ethics, misconduct, abuse, fraud, scam, game, manipulation,
   rank, rankings, impact, Hindex, KPI, KPIs
%X "Some scholars add authors to their research papers or grant proposals even
   when those individuals contribute nothing to the research effort. Some
   journal editors coerce authors to add citations that are not pertinent to
   their work & some authors pad their reference lists with superfluous
   citations. ... Even though the majority of scholars disapprove of such
   tactics, many feel pressured to make such additions while others suggest
   that it is just the way the game is played. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187394]['17].
   [Also search for: publish perish]  and  [also search for: citation abuse].

%A J. Smyth
%T The Toxic University: Zombie Leadership, Academic Rock Stars and
   Neoliberal Ideology
%I PalgraveMacmillan
%P 235
%D 2017
%K book, c2017, c201x, c20xx, zz0518, University, tertiary, higher education,
   academic, management, politics, teaching, research, faculty, dean, deanitis,
   jargon, impact, KPI, KPIs, superstars, Federation Uni, Monash, Gippsland,
   Australia, ranking, rating, performance manage, workload, league table,
   tables, neoliberal, neoliberalism, Reaganomics, zombie, leader, leadership
%X 1st ed 2017; hb us$64; uk us isbn:1137549769; uk us isbn13:978-1137549761.
   "This book considers the detrimental changes that have occurred to the
   institution of the university, as a result of the withdrawal of state funding
   and the imposition of neoliberal market reforms on higher education. It
   argues that universities have lost their way, and are currently drowning in
   an impenetrable mush of economic babble, spurious spin-offs of zombie
   economics, management-speak and militaristic-corporate jargon. ...
   meaningless marketing hype ..."
   (Also see, "John Smyth has a call to arms for academics frustrated by trends
   in higher education in the United States, Britain, Australia and
   elsewhere. ..."
   -- [www][11/12/17].)
   [Also search for: toxic university].

%A Y. Polozhentseva
%A M. Klevtsova
%T KPI-monitoring for university's performance improvement
%J Economic Annals-XXI
%V 163
%N 1-2(1)
%P 71-74
%D 2017
%K jrnl, c2017, c201x, c20xx, zz1019, university, academic, research,
   managament, education, KPI, KPIs, ranking, rankings, THES, Leiden, QS,
   SCImago, ERA, ARC, Stanford, Harvard, Cambridge, Oxford, Toronto, Tokyo,
   Lomonosov, Moscow, europe, uk, usa, russia
%X "Approaches based on KPI-monitoring are used by commercial entities
   worldwide. However, such an approach is new and insufficiently developed for
   universities. Specific features of their functioning necessitate not just
   assessment of their economic efficiency but also consideration of special
   aspects of higher education. Therefore, studying the issues of uni.
   performance monitoring based on the development of a system of indicators is
   challenging in terms of encouraging rapid international development of
   'smart economy'. The article contains analysis of universities' global
   rankings based on the selection of indicators of KPI-monitoring system to
   show development of university competitive strengths related to countries'
   economic development."
   -- [www]['19].
   [Also search for: university management].
   (Also see [rankings].)

%A J. Z. Muller
%T The Tyranny of Metrics
%I PrincetonUP
%P 240
%D 2018
%K book, c2018, c201x, c20xx, zz0218, publish, perish, bibliometrics, impact,
   Hindex, KIP, KPIs, misuse, teaching, scores
%X 1st ed 2018; hb us$19; uk us isbn:0691174954; uk us isbn13:978-0691174952.
   "...  our zeal to instill the evaluation process with scientific rigor,
   we've gone from measuring performance to fixating on measuring itself. The
   result is a tyranny of metrics that threatens the quality of our lives and
   most important institutions. ... Filled with examples from education,
   medicine, business and finance, government, the police and military, and
   philanthropy and foreign aid, this brief and accessible book explains why the
   seemingly irresistible pressure to quantify performance distorts and
   distracts, whether by encouraging "gaming the stats" or
   'teaching to the test." ..."

%A K. Gross
%A C. T. Bergstrom
%T Contest models highlight inefficiencies of scientific funding
%J arXiv
%D 2018
%K TR, c2018, c201x, c20xx, zz0418, scientific, academic, university, research,
   grant, grants, writing, proposals, ARC, NIH, waste, KPI, KPIs, model
%X "... At a first approximation, the work invested in writing proposals
   provides no value to the funder. Here, we use the economic theory of contests
   to analyze the scientific efficiency of the proposal system, & compare it to
   recently proposed, partially randomized alternatives such as lotteries. We
   find that the effort researchers waste in writing proposals may be comparable
   to the total scientific value of the additional funding, especially when only
   a small percentage of proposals are funded. Moreover, when professional
   pressures motivate investigators to seek funding for reasons that extend
   beyond the value of the proposed science, the entire program can act as a
   drag on scientific progress when paylines are low. We suggest that lost
   efficiency may be recouped at low paylines either by partial lotteries for
   funding, or by funding researchers based on past scientific success instead
   of proposals for future work."
   -- 1804.03732@[arXiv]['18].

%A J. Tregoning
%T How will you judge me if not by impact factor?
%J Nature
%V 558
%N 7710
%P ?-?
%D 2018
%K views, c2018, c201x, c20xx, zz0618, publish, perish, impact, KPI, KPIs, JIF,
   publications, journal, scientific research, university, Hindex
%X "Rumours among junior faculty members are that reports of the death of the
   impact factor are greatly exaggerated. ... Ideally, just putting our research
   out there should be enough for people to descry our brilliance and promote
   it accordingly. But that is not how the system works. ... Although DORA is
   in my heart, impact factors are still on my mind. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-018-05467-5]['18].
   [Also search for: publish perish]  and  [also search for: Hindex abuse].

%A J. P. A. Ioannidis
%A R. Klavans
%A K. W. Boyack
%T Thousands of scientists publish a paper every five days
%J Nature
%V 561
%P 167-169
%D 2018
%K news, views, c2018, c201x, c20xx, zz0918, publish, perish, scientific,
   research, paper, papers, Scopus, guest authorship, implausibly prolific,
   questionable, dubious, glut, Hindex, KPI, KPIs
%X "... We searched Scopus for authors who had published more than 72 papers
   (the equivalent of one paper every 5 days) in any one calendar year between
   2000 and 2016, a figure that many would consider implausibly prolific. We
   found more than 9,000 individuals, and made every effort to count only
   'full papers' - articles, conference papers, substantive comments and
   reviews - not editorials, letters to the editor and the like. We hoped that
   this could be a useful exercise in understanding what scientific authorship
   means. ..."
   --  [doi:10.1038/d41586-018-06185-8]['18].
   [Also search for: publish perish] & [also search for: implausibly prolific].

%A P. Azouly
%T Small research teams 'disrupt' science more radically than large ones
%J Nature
%V 566
%N 7743
%P ?
%D 2019
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0219, scientific research, teams,
   paper, papers, citation, impact, KPI, KPIs, small, research grant, grants,
   ARC, NIH, publish, perish, Wu, Wang, Evans
%X "The application of a new citation metric prompts a reassessment of the
   relationship between the size of scientific teams and research impact, &
   calls into question the trend to emphasize 'big team' science. ...
   Citation behaviour can also reflect strategic considerations, such as
   currying favour with referees or editor ... Wu and colleagues ... describe &
   validate a citation-based index of 'disruptiveness' that has previously been
   proposed for patents. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00350-3]['19].

%A L. Wu
%A D. Wang
%A J. A. Evans
%T Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology
%J Nature
%V 566
%N ?
%P ?
%D 2019
%K jrnl, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0219, scientific research, team, teams,
   paper, papers, citation, impact, KPI, KPIs, small, research grant, grants,
   ARC, NIH, disruption, disruptive, new, idea, ideas, Hindex, Sleeping Beauty,
   SBindex, Web of Science, WOS, software, patent, publish, perish
%X "... [trend] today is the growth of large teams in all areas ...
   Here we analyse more than 65 million papers, patents & s/w products that span
   the period 1954-2014, & demonstrate that across this period smaller teams
   have tended to disrupt sci. & tech. with new ideas & opportunities, whereas
   larger teams have tended to develop existing ones. ... Observed differences
   between small & large teams are magnified for higher-impact work, with small
   teams known for disruptive work & large teams for developing work. ...
   science policies should aim to support a diversity of team sizes."
   -- [doi:10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9][13/2/'19],
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A R. Connell
%T The Good University. What universities actually do and why it's time for
   radical change
%I MonashUP
%P 240
%D 2019
%K book, text, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0519, university, management, KPI, KPIs,
   rankings, league tables, ERA, quality, higher education, neoliberal,
   Reaganomics, faculty, teaching, research, ethics, administration,
   Monash, MUP, Australia
%X 1st ed 2019; hb us uk isbn:1786995417; uk us isbn13:978-1786995414;
                pb au$30; isbn13:978-1925835038.
   "The higher ed. industry might seem like it's booming, with over 200 million
   students in universities & colleges worldwide & funds flowing in like never
   before. But the truth is that these institutions have never been unhappier
   places to work. Corporate-style management, cost-cutting governments,
   mobilisations by angry students & strikes by disgruntled staff have all taken
   their toll - in almost every country around the world. It's no wonder that
   there is talk of 'universities in crisis.' ... outlines a practical vision
   for how our unis. can become both more engaging & more productive places,
   driven by social good rather than profit, & helping to build fairer
   [Also search for: university management].

%A H. Else
%T Impact factors are still widely used in academic evaluations
%J Nature
%V ?
%N ?
%D 2019
%K news, vews, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0419, impact, KPI, KPIs, JIF, DORA,
   journal, university, culture, promotion, hire, hiring, job, jobs, employment,
   management, research, USA
%X "Almost half [~40%] of research-intensive universities consider jrnl impact
   factors when deciding whom to promote, a survey of North American
   institutions has found. ... has been widely criticized as a crude and
   misleading proxy for the quality of scientists' work. ... unhealthy research
   culture ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-019-01151-4]['19].
   (Also see [doi:10.1038/d41586-018-01642-w][2/2019].)
   Probably .uk and .au are much the same as .us?
   [Also search for: university management].

%A A. Finkel
%T To move research from quantity to quality, go beyond good intentions
%J Nature
%V 566
%N 566
%P 297
%D 2019
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0419, university, management, faculty,
   KPI, KPIs, science, scientific research, Hindex, gIndex, KPI, KPIs, publish,
   perish, publications, papers, journals, JIF, SNIP, citations, bibliometrics,
   impact, quality, ERA, ARC, Australia, chief scientist,
   quote, quotable, Monash
%X "... Next, institutions must heed growing calls to abandon paper counting and
   similar metrics for evaluating researchers. One alternative approach, the
   Rule of Five, demonstrates a clear commitment to quality: candidates present
   their best five papers over the past five years, accompanied by a description
   of the research, its impact and their individual contribution. The exact
   numbers are immaterial: what matters is the focus on quality. A handful of
   institutions have required reviewers to consider individual contributions
   rather than lists of publications, and the shift has not been easy. Reviewers
   should be admonished for Googling individuals' h-indices and citation lists,
   for example. Perseverance and self-reflection are essential. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00613-z]['19].
   (Alan Finkel is Australian chief scientist and was
   Chancellor of Monash University 2008-2016.)
   [Also search for: publish perish] & [also search for: university management].

%A M. Dillon
%T University of Adelaide to run probe into 'culture' at world-class
   ancient DNA lab
%D 2019
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0719, university, Adelaide, Australia,
   Australian, research, ACAD, Ancient DNA, academia, scientific research,
   university management, scientific, culture, toxic, KPI, KPIs
%X '... The university confirmed it was undertaking a "culture check" at the
   Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD) ... described the culture at ACAD
   as "cut-throat", "competitive" and "everyone was in it for themselves". ...
   "We all developed health problems, I developed really debilitating stomach
   problems that would floor me anything from a week to a month," ...'
   -- [abc][12/7/2019].

%A J. P. A. Ioannidis
%A J. Baas
%A R. Klavans
%A K. W. Boyack
%T A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for
   scientific field
%J PLoS Biology
%V 17
%N 8
%P e3000384
%D 2019
%K jrnl, eJrnl, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz0919, publish, perish, impact, KPI, KPIs,
   scientific, university, academic, research, management, bibliometrics,
   scientist, authorship, Hindex, hmIndex, citations, papers
%X "Citation metrics are widely used & misused. We have created a publicly
   available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized
   info. on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to
   papers in different authorship positions, & a composite indicator. Separate
   data are shown for career-long & single-year impact. Metrics with & without
   self-citations & ratio of citations to citing papers are given. Scientists
   are classified into 22 scientific fields & 176 subfields. Field- &
   subfield-specific percentiles are also provided for all scientists who have
   published at least five papers. Career-long data are updated to end of 2017
   & to end of 2018 for comparison."
   -- [doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384]['19], via AK.
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%T A kinder research culture is possible
%J Nature
%D 2019
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz1019, scientific, university, research,
   KPI, KPIs, quality, excellence, management, culture, ARC, grants, ERA,
   Farrar, Welcome Trust, biol, biology
%X "Wellcome's director Jeremy Farrar didn't hold back. 'The emphasis on
   excellence in the research system is stifling diverse thinking and positive
   behaviours,' he wrote in a blog post last month. 'The relentless drive for
   research excellence has created a culture in modern science that cares
   exclusively about what is achieved and not about how it is achieved.' These
   are strong words, not least because Farrar acknowledges that the UK
   biomedical funding charity that he leads helped to create such a focus on
   excellence. ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-019-02951-4]['19].
   [Also search for: scientific research management].

%A G. Livan
%T Don't follow the leader: how ranking performance reduces meritocracy
%J Royal Soc., Open Sci.
%V 6
%N 191255
%D 2019
%K jrnl, eJrnl, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz1119, interesting, ranking, rankings,
   peer, peers, ERA, ARC, KPI, KPIs, university research, Alife, performance,
   inequality, meritocracy, PRF, serendipity, imitation, bast practice,
   bibliometrics, bibliometric, citations
%X "In the name of meritocracy, modern economies devote increasing amounts of
   resources to quantifying and ranking the performanceof individuals and
   organizations. ... several studies have shown that the imitation of best
   practices often leads to a drop in performance. So, should those lagging
   behind in a ranking imitate top performers or should they instead pursue a
   strategy of their own? I tackle this question by numerically simulating a
   stylized model of a society whose agents seek to climb a ranking either by
   imitating the actions oftop performers or by randomly trying out different
   actions, i.e. via serendipity. The model gives rise to a rich phenomenology,
   showing that the imitation of top performers increases welfare overall, but
   at the cost of higher inequality. Indeed, the imitation of top performers
   turns out to be a self-defeating strategy that consolidates the early
   advantage of a few lucky - and not necessarily  talented - winners, leading
   to a very unequal, homogenized and effectively non-meritocratic society.
   Conversely, serendipity favours meritocratic outcomes and prevents rankings
   from freezing."
   -- [doi:10.1098/rsos.191255]['19],
   [Also search for: Campbell Law] and [also search for: Goodhart Law].

%T Quality over quantity: How the Dutch Research Council is giving
   researchers the opportunity to showcase diverse types of talent
%D 2019
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz1219, scientific, university, research,
   CV, CVs, management, DORA, NWO Veni, quality, diversity, publish, perish,
   citations, KPI, KPIs, Hindex
%X "The Dutch Research Council (NWO) is piloting a narrative CV format in the
   Veni scheme, its major funding instrument for early career researchers. The
   format advances showcasing diverse types of talent and encourages assessment
   of quality rather than quantity. ... The Key output section allows a maximum
   of ten output items. ... banned what we consider unreliable metrics. We
   exclude the use of journal impact factors and any kind of metric that refers
   to journal, publisher, or publication platform, and also ban (H-)indexes,
   citation avgs, totals, & sums, as these measures are sensitive to bias. ..."
   -- [www][14/11/2019].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A A. Hatch
%T To fix research assessment, swap slogans for definitions
%J Nature
%V 576
%N 9
%D 2019
%K news, views, c2019, c201x, c20xx, zz1219, publish, perish, DORA, university,
   scientific, research, impact, rating, rankings, KPI, KPIs, quality
%X "... My view is that most assessment guidelines permit sliding standards:
   instead of clearly defined terms, they give us feel-good slogans that lack
   any fixed meaning. Facing the problem will get us much of the way towards a
   solution. ...":
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03696-w]['19].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A M. Bagioli
%T Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research
%I MITpress
%P 306
%D 2020
%K book, text, MIT, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz1120, university management, jobs,
   academia, faculty, scientific research, impact, KPI, KPIs, JIF, gaming, scam,
   miconduct, fraud, citation ring, peer review, publications, audit culture,
   China, Australia, Melbourne, Queensland
%X 2020, pb us$63; asin=B08BT3S9LL; isbn13: 978-0262537933.
   "... Gaming the Metrics examines how the increasing reliance on metrics to
   evaluate scholarly publications has produced radically new forms of academic
   fraud and misconduct. ..."
   "... In China, universities hand substantial cash bonuses to their faculty
   for their publ'ns, indexing them to the j's impact factor. Nature & Science
   articles fetch over $30,000 a piece. Similar schemes can be found on the
   other side of the Equator: Melbourne Business School pays $A15,000 cash for
   every paper published in the Top 40 list compiled by the Financial Times. The
   scheme at Queensland University Business School is more complicated. Payments
   made to the departmental accounts of authors, are ~ : Tier 1 j. - $A12,000;
   Tier 2 j. - $A7500; Tier 3 j. - $A5500; Tier 4 j. - $A2000;
   Professional j. - $A1000. (Macdonald & Kam, 2007) ..."
   Also at [MITpress][2020].
   [Also search for: university management].

%A R. Van Noorden
%T Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse
%J Nature
%V 578
%P 200-201
%D 2020
%K news, views, VanNorden, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz0220, publish, perish,
   research, coerce, coercive, citations, papers, gIndex, Hindex, KPI, KPIs,
   impact, university management, JTB, journals, Kuo-Chen Chou, KCChou,
   KuoChenChou, peer review, research, refereeing, scam, abuse, ethics
%X "A US-based biophysicist [Kuo-Chen Chou] who is one of the world's most
   highly cited researchers has been removed from the editorial board of one
   journal and barred as a reviewer for another, after repeatedly manipulating
   the peer-review process to amass citations to his own work. ... asked authors
   of dozens of papers he was editing to cite a long list of his publications -
   sometimes more than 50 ..."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-020-00335-7]['20].
   [Also search for: peer review]  and  [also search for: KuoChenChou].

%A S. Horbach
%A W. Hepkema
%A W. Halffman
%T Hundreds of journals' editorial practices captured in database
%J Nature
%V 582
%N 7810
%P ?-?
%D 2020
%K news, views, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz0620, PREP, peer review, research,
   Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies, responsiblejournals, journals,
   KPIs, JIF, impact, editor, editorial, practice, policy, refereeing,
   scientific research, reviewing, publishing, ethics
%X "We have launched a Platform for Responsible Editorial Policies
   [www]. This facilitates
   transparent review and research into peer-review procedures, thereby
   contributing to open science and optimal journal management."
   -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-020-01628-7]['20].

%A S. Richie
%T Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the
   Search for Truth
%I MetropolitanBooks
%P 368
%D 2020
%K book, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz0720, science, scientific, university, research,
   ethics, fraud, misconduct, manipulation, stats, errors, mistake, peer review,
   reviewing, pressure, impact, KPI, KPIs, Hindex, Phacking
%X 1st ed 2020; hb us$23; uk us isbn:1250222699; uk us isbn13:978-1250222695.
   "... failures in peer review and mistakes in statistics have rendered a
   shocking number of scientific studies useless - or, worse, badly misleading.
   ... reveals the very human biases, misunderstandings, and deceptions that
   undermine the scientific endeavor: from contamination in science labs to the
   secret vaults of failed studies that nobody gets to see; from outright
   cheating with fake data to the more common, but still ruinous, temptation to
   exaggerate mediocre results for a shot at scientific fame. ..."

%A J. D. Wren
%A C. Georgescu
%T Detecting potential reference list manipulation within a citation network
%J bioRxiv
%D 2020
%K TR, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz0820, publish, perish, KPI, KPIs, Hindex, impact,
   misconduct, paper, peer review, reviewing, cite, citation, abuse, reference,
   manipulation, scam, coercive, coercion, coercive, RLM, Kuo-Chen Chou, KCChou,
   KuoChenChou, Roukos, journals, JTB, Elsevier, Gini, GiniIndex
%X "... reference list manipulation (RLM) could take place during the
   peer-review process (e.g., coercive citation from editors or reviewers), or
   prior to it (e.g., a quid-pro-quo between authors). ... find the freq. of
   non-self citations (NSC) to one author coming from one paper ~ Zipf's law.
   We propose the Gini Index as a simple means of quantifying skew in this
   dist'n ... We estimate between 81 (FDR < 0.05) & 231 (FDR < 0.10) authors are
   outliers on the curve, suggestive of chronic, repeated RLM. Based upon the
   distribution, we est. ~ 3,284 (16%) of all authors may have engaged in RLM
   to some degree ..."
   -- [bioRxiv]['20],
   (Also see: "Signs of 'citation hacking' flagged in scientific papers",
   Nature 14/8/2020 [www]['20] and
   "Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse",
   Nature 6/2/2020 [www]['20].)
   [Also search for: Hindex manipulation] and [also search for: KuoChenChou].

%T 'Make research fun again': UK's powerful funding chief is on a mission to
   change scientific culture
%J Nature
%V 584
%P 508
%D 2020
%K news, views, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz0820, Ottoline Leyser, UK, UKRI,
   scientific research, university, management, impact, KPI, KPIs, grant,
   grants, peer review
%X -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02424-z]['20].
   [Also search for: scientific research grants].

%A N. N. Trakakis
%T Wayne's world: How universities are crushing academics
%D 2020
%K news, view, research, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz1020, university management,
   academia, toxic, Grimm, Imperial College London, ICL, ARC, Australia, ERA,
   grants, rankings, leadership, deans, deanitis, Faculty, KPI, KPIs
%X "... The rise and effects of this pathology have been well documented by
   Australian academic John Smyth in his book, The Toxic University. He points,
   for example, to a 2011 study of staff in 16 Australian universities, which
   found that academics feel berated and denigrated, rather than inspired and
   supported, by their research leadership. The malaise, according to Smyth,
   lies largely in the reduction of higher education to a business enterprise,
   driving university leaders to place their faith in 'gaming the market of
   academic casino capitalism' - just consider the ERA scheme. ..."
   -- [www][29/9/2020].
   [Also search for: university management].

%A M. Mejigaard
%A et al
%T Research integrity: Nine ways to move from talk to walk
%J Nature
%V 586
%P 358-360
%D 2020
%K news, views, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz1120, scientific research, ethics,
   integrity, Delft, Imperial College, University management, Faculty, Dean,
   academic misconduct, academia, KPI, KPIs, impact, JIF, EU, Horizon Europe
%X "In 2018, Delft U. of Tech. in the Netherlands began building a community of
   data champions across all faculties, ... Imperial College London now shuns
   journal-based metrics in staff assessment; it relies more on peer judgement
   of research quality. At Mahidol U. in Bangkok, Thailand, all staff sign the
   university's code of good governance ..."
    -- [doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02847-8]['20].
   [Also search for: university management]  and  [also search for: KCChou].

%A J. E. Hirsch
%T Superconductivity, what the H? The Emperor has no clothes
%J Physics and Society
%D 2020
%K publish, perish, JEHirsch, TR, c2020, c202x, c20xx, zz0820, news, views,
   physics, superconductor, Hindex, misuse, abuse, jrnl, KPI, KPIs, impact,
   university, scientific research, bibliometrics, wry,
   quote, quotable, controversial
%X "... For better or for worse, I am most famous (or infamous) for the
   invention of the Hindex. ... In a nutshell, my observation is that about half
   the scientific community loves the Hindex & half hates it, & the Hindex of
   the scientist itself is a great predictor of whether s/he belongs to the 1st
   or the 2nd group, in addition to its other virtues. I am not completely
   unhappy with the impact of my paper, which is by far my most highly cited
   one. As Oscar Wilde said, 'There is only one thing in life worse than being
   talked about ...'. ...  But I have now come to believe that it can also fail
   spectacularly & have severe unintended -ve consequences. I can understand how
   the sorcerer's apprentice must have felt. ..."
   -- 2001.09496@[arXiv]['20].
   [Also search for: publish perish].

%A W. B. Cameron
%T Quote
%K quote, quotable, c1963, c196x, c19xx, funny, count, counts, counting,
   counted, everything, KPI, KPIs, Einstein
%X "not everything that can be counted counts, and
   not everything that counts can be counted."
   Quote Investigator attributes it to W. B. Cameron, 'Informal
   Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking' (1963),
   (although many think it is due to Einstein).
   Note, QI's page contains a  "picture of Einstein at blackboard
   with *fictitious* writing constructed at"
   [Also search for: Campbell law]  and  [also search for: Goodhart law].

%A Arthur Lesk
%T On Deans
%D pre-2014
%K University, Faculty, Dean, Deans, deanitis, tertiary education, research,
   academic, university management, KPI, KPIs, quality (not), publications,
   papers, impact, publish, perish, zz0614, funny, ha ha, haha, quote,
   quotable, ALesk, AMLesk
%X Deans are  unable to read,
   Deans are unable to weigh,
   Counting is roughly their speed,
   So publish a little each day.

Search string: