Soil Moisture Estimation
Using Remote Sensing
|
|
|
Jeffrey Walker |
|
Dept Civil and Env Eng |
|
The
University of Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Houser |
|
Hydrological Sciences Branch, Head |
|
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center |
|
|
|
http://www.civag.unimelb.edu.au/~jwalker |
Importance of Soil
Moisture
|
|
|
|
Early warning systems |
|
Flood forecasting |
|
Socio-economic activities |
|
Agriculture management – yield
forecasting, pesticides etc |
|
Water management – irrigation |
|
Policy planning |
|
Drought relief |
|
Global change |
|
Weather and climate |
|
Evapotranspiration |
Soil Moisture vs Sea
Surface Temp
|
|
|
Knowledge of soil moisture has a
greater impact on the predictability of summertime precipitation over land at
mid-latitudes than Sea Surface Temperature (SST). |
|
|
The Situation
The Problem With LSMs
|
|
|
Same forcing and initial conditions but
different predictions of soil moisture! |
Importance of Soil
Moisture
Soil Moisture Coverage:
Veg (Mean PR)
Data Assimilation Defined
|
|
|
Definition 1: using data to force a
model
ie. precipitation and evapotranspiration to force a LSM |
|
Analogy: passenger giving instructions
to a blindfolded driver on the M1 at peak hour |
|
|
|
|
The Kalman Filter
(sequential
assimilation)
Catchment-based LSM
Catchment Discretisation
Bias Reduced Forcing
|
|
|
|
|
Observational Data Sets |
|
NCAR Northern Hemisphere Sea Level Pressure |
|
01/1899 – present; 5 x 5 degrees |
|
Climate Research Unit (University of
East Anglia) Temperature and Precipitation |
|
01/01 - 12/98; 0.5 x 0.5 degrees |
|
Center for Climatic Research
(University of Delaware) Terrestrial Temperature and Precipitation |
|
01/50 - 12/96 ; 0.5 x 0.5 degree |
|
Global Precipitation Climatology
Project (GPCP) |
|
01/86 - 03/95; 2.5 x 2.5 degree |
|
Langley Eight Year Shortwave and Longwave
Surface Radiation Budget |
|
07/83 - 06/91 - in process of being
extended; 2.5 x 2.5 degree |
|
|
|
Re-Analysis Atmospheric Forcing Data
Sets |
|
ECMWF Re-analysis Advanced Global Data |
|
4x/day, 01/79 - 12/93 |
|
1.125 degrees (Gaussian) |
|
NCEP/NCAR Re-analysis |
|
4x/day, 01/48 – 12/99 |
|
2.5 x 2.5 degrees |
|
|
|
Bias Correct Using Monthly Mean
Observational Data Sets |
|
|
|
|
|
Berg, Famiglietti, Walker and Houser, AMS 2001 |
SMMR Soil Moisture
Observations
Soil Moisture Time
Series: Illinois
Animation
Slide 16
Evaluation of
Assimilation
|
|
|
|
How can we evaluate the soil moisture
assimilation? |
|
Soil moisture – ideal but limited data
available. United states has 19 stations in Illinois, 6 stations in Iowa and
transect of 89 points in New Mexico for SMMR period. |
|
Analysis increments – only provides a
check for systematic biases. |
|
Runoff - data available but assumes
that soil moisture is the only reason for poor estimates. |
|
Evapotranspiration – data not available
and assumes that soil moisture is the only reason for poor estimates. |
|
Precipitation forecasts – assumes soil
moisture is the only reason for poor forecasts. |
|
Other ? |
|
|
Soil Moisture: Iowa
Conclusions
|
|
|
First known study to assimilate
space-borne soil moisture measurements |
|
|
|
Soil moisture estimate with
assimilation was an improvement when compared to point measurements |