Soil Moisture Data
Assimilation
Using the 1D EKF
| 1,2Jeffrey Walker and 2Paul Houser | |
| 1Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center | |
| 2NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center | |
| http://land.gsfc.nasa.gov/~cejpw |
Land Surface Initialization for Seasonal-to-Interannual Prediction
| Goal: Provide global land surface initialization states for the retrospective period of 1979 to present. | ||
| A two-tiered approach. | ||
| Tier 1: Spin-up the land surface model off-line from the GCM using the best atmospheric forcing data available. Minimizes forcing bias! | ||
| Tier 2:Assimilate passive microwave remote sensing observations of near-surface soil moisture from SMMR and SSM/I. Minimizes model and forcing bias! | ||
| Re-Analysis Atmospheric Forcing Data Sets | |||
| ECMWF Re-analysis Advanced Global Data | |||
| 4x/day, 01/79 - 12/93 | |||
| 1.125 degrees (Gaussian) | |||
| NCEP/NCAR Re-analysis | |||
| 4x/day, 01/48 – 12/99 | |||
| 2.5 x 2.5 degrees | |||
| Bias Correct Using Monthly Mean Observational Data Sets | |||
| Observational Data Sets | |||
| NCAR Northern Hemisphere Sea Level Pressure | |||
| 01/1899 – present; 5 x 5 degrees | |||
| Climate Research Unit (University of East Anglia) Temperature and Precipitation | |||
| 01/01 - 12/98; 0.5 x 0.5 degrees | |||
| Center for Climatic Research (University of Delaware) Terrestrial Temperature and Precipitation | |||
| 01/50 - 12/96 ; 0.5 x 0.5 degree | |||
| Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) | |||
| 01/86 - 03/95; 2.5 x 2.5 degree | |||
| Langley Eight Year Shortwave and Longwave Surface Radiation Budget | |||
| 07/83 - 06/91 - in process of being extended; 2.5 x 2.5 degree | |||
| Accurate initial conditions for the land surface are necessary for accurate predictions of precipitation. | ||
| LSM spin-up does not guarantee correct land surface initialization. | ||
| Errors in land surface forecasts result from: | ||
| The memory of errors in LSM initialization. | ||
| Errors in atmospheric forcing data. | ||
| Errors in LSM physics. | ||
| Errors in soil and topographic data. | ||
SMMR Polarization Ratio (Mean)
SMMR Polarization Ratio (Std Dev)
Soil Moisture Time Series: Illinois
Soil Moisture: Lat 50, Lon -100
| How can we evaluate the soil moisture assimilation? | ||
| Soil moisture – ideal but limited data available. United states has 19 stations in Illinois, 6 stations in Iowa and transect of 89 points in New Mexico for SMMR period. | ||
| Analysis increments – only provides check for systematic biases. | ||
| Runoff - data available but assumes that soil moisture is the only reason for poor estimates. | ||
| Evapotranspiration – data not available and assumes that soil moisture is the only reason for poor estimates. | ||
| Precipitation forecasts – assumes soil moisture is the only reason for poor forecasts. | ||
| Other ? | ||
| Move towards a global implementation of the assimilation. | |
| Develop a set of global soil moisture initialization states for the start of each month from 1979 to 1987 (term of SMMR data). |